06-reference/research

squarely trademark clearance search

2026-06-19·research-brief·source: deep-research
squarelytrademarkusptoclearanceip-strategy

Fresh USPTO Clearance Check for the SQUARELY Mark Before Filing

The question

Has any third party filed a "Squarely"-adjacent mark in IC 009 (software/apps), IC 016 (printed books), IC 028 (games/toys), or IC 041 (entertainment services) since the 2026-04-25 vault clearance search? Context: RDCO is about to file the SQUARELY word mark for its puzzle-book + iOS-app brand and needs a fresh pre-filing clearance pass.

What we already know (from the vault)

What the web says

(Automated pass via WebSearch + WebFetch of publicly indexed records. The live USPTO Trademark Search at tmsearch.uspto.gov and the Justia/Trademarkia record pages all block automated fetch — see confidence caveat below. No registration could be directly confirmed or ruled out.)

Convergences and contradictions

Synthesis for RDCO

Recommendation: PROCEED-WITH-CAUTION; the IC 016-first word-mark filing path is most likely still clear, but a real attorney clearance search is now non-optional because of a newly-surfaced same-category common-law collision.

Per-class read on the available (limited) evidence:

Explicit confidence statement and limits. This is a LOW-confidence automated pass. I could NOT run an authenticated live search on tmsearch.uspto.gov (the current system; TESS was retired Nov 2023), and the public record databases (Justia, Trademarkia) returned HTTP 403 to automated fetch. I therefore could not directly confirm or rule out any specific USPTO serial number, nor re-verify the two baseline marks' current status. The strongest concrete new finding — the Hex Tree Games "Squarely" game — comes from Steam, not a trademark register, so its USPTO status is unknown. An automated pass cannot substitute for a real pre-filing clearance. Before money moves, RDCO should run (or have a USPTO-registered attorney run) a full live search on tmsearch.uspto.gov across IC 009/016/028/041 for "squarely" and phonetic/visual neighbors (squarly, squarley, square-ly, squarely + puzzle/games), and specifically investigate whether Hex Tree Games has filed or intends to file. This dovetails with the 2026-06-13 brief's recommendation to route the filing through an attorney (or Amazon IP Accelerator) anyway — the clearance search is part of that engagement, not a separate cost.

Net: don't let this stall the IC 016 book-class filing, which still looks clean and is the Phase-1 Brand-Registry gate. Do treat the IC 009/041 digital-game classes as needing a real, attorney-run clearance against the now-known Hex Tree "Squarely" before filing them at iOS launch.

Open follow-ups

Related

Sources