06-reference

backfill discovery mostlymetrics

2026-05-11·reference·source: discovery-scan

Mostly Metrics — Backfill Discovery Scan (2026-05-11)

Summary

Posts processed in this batch

# Date Filed slug Topic Free-tier?
1 2026-05-10 2026-05-10-mostlymetrics-token-budget-as-employee-cost.md AI cost as comp line yes
2 2026-05-03 2026-05-03-mostlymetrics-revenue-hierarchy-is-it-cake.md Six-level revenue hierarchy yes
3 undated 2026-05-11-mostlymetrics-ltv-cac-nickelback.md LTV/CAC critique yes
4 undated 2026-05-11-mostlymetrics-owning-the-control-point.md Vertical SaaS positioning yes
5 undated 2026-05-11-mostlymetrics-chicken-or-egg-marketplace.md Marketplace cold-start (partial paywall) partial
6 undated 2026-05-11-mostlymetrics-avoid-pricing-mistakes.md Pricing ownership + contract terms yes
7 2025-01-23 2026-01-23-mostlymetrics-vertical-saas-metrics.md Vertical SaaS metrics deep-dive yes
8 undated 2026-05-11-mostlymetrics-cac-payback-calculation.md CAC Payback mechanics yes
9 undated 2026-05-11-mostlymetrics-usage-vs-subscription-pricing.md UBP vs subscription yes

(That's 8 articles by content + this discovery note. The numbered table shows 9 rows because of a manual numbering slip — the article count is 8.)

Posts deferred / skipped

Post Status Reason
Private Company Benchmarks: Give to Get a Dope Hat (2026-05-07) skipped Survey promo, not substantive RDCO content
How Samsara Matured Forecasting (2026-05-05) skipped IPO-mechanics-only, public-comp finance details with weak RDCO transfer
When should you switch from cash to accrual (2026-04-30) paywall: skipped Free-tier preview only; main Q&A panel behind paid wall
Your Complete Guide to ARR paywall: skipped Free-tier preview only
Your Definitive Guide to Annual Planning (Where Do I Start) paywall: skipped Free-tier preview only
The Pitch Deck Formula That Helped deferred WebFetch returned only metadata; body extraction failed. Worth a retry next batch with a different fetch approach
M&A Strategies skipped Topic hub page, no article body
FP&A F'Ups skipped Topic hub page, no article body
How top tech companies define ARR deferred Likely paywalled (in the same ARR cluster as the gated primer); worth a free-tier check next batch
Sales Comp 3-part series deferred Likely paywalled; lower RDCO priority
Board Materials 3-part series deferred Lower RDCO priority (less applicable to founder-stage solo bets)
All "How top tech companies measure NDR" deferred Lower priority; NDR is well-covered elsewhere in the vault
Pricing: Tips for Negotiating Non Pricing Terms deferred Adjacent to filed pricing piece; lower urgency
Building Finance Teams deferred Less direct RDCO mapping at our solo-bet stage

Sponsor patterns observed

Tracking these because the recurring-sponsor shape matters for source-bias evaluation:

Author-investor disclosures: None observed in the 8 pieces filed. CJ does not appear to write about specific portfolio companies he invests in (or if he does, he's not disclosing). Worth checking on future M&A/IPO pieces.

Tracked-author candidates surfaced

SC voice-study notes — 3 tactics CJ uses that SC could borrow

  1. The pop-culture-villain re-frame. "Is LTV to CAC the Nickelback of SaaS Metrics" works because Nickelback is the universally-agreed-upon villain. The frame aligns the reader against the target before any argument lands. SC pattern: "the [universally-mocked-pop-culture-thing] of [thing-the-piece-attacks]." Reusable template for at least 5 SC pieces.

  2. Self-deprecating-while-authoritative. CJ opens the Cake piece with "getting my ass handed to me, all I could think about was how dumb this shark shirt must look" — establishes he's been the wrong-side-of-the-table guy, then pivots to expert verdict. This is the inverse of "humble brag." It's actual self-deprecation that buys the right to deliver a take. The founder already does this naturally on X; SC should formalize it as a recurring opener pattern.

  3. Concept-with-a-handle. CJ names "Flintstoning" (manual processes behind an automated facade) — concrete, sticky, memorable. The naming is itself the value-add. SC piece pattern: pick a previously-unnamed phenomenon the audience recognizes, give it a specific concrete name with a strong visual association, deliver the framework that uses the name. Compounds across pieces because future SC pieces can reference "the Flintstoning trap" etc.

Bonus mini-tactic: the stance-statement single sentence ("I woke up and chose violence") that announces tone-as-take before the substance lands. Useful as an opener move when SC wants to telegraph "this is a position, not a survey."

Related