06-reference

write with ai three niche myths

Thu Apr 16 2026 20:00:00 GMT-0400 (Eastern Daylight Time) ·reference ·source: Write With AI (Substack) ·by Nicolas Cole (Cole)
audience-buildingniche-selectiondigital-productscreator-economymindset

“You’re sitting on a $100,000+ digital product” — @Cole (Nicolas Cole)

Why this is in the vault

The email wraps a bootcamp pitch around three specific reframes about niche selection that are directly relevant to the RDCO content engine and Sanity Check positioning. The frameworks are extractable independent of the CTA.

Sponsorship

Self-promotional throughout. The article exists to sell the Low-Ticket Launchpad LIVE bootcamp (“$350 Digital Product in 14 Days With AI”). Two CTAs to a Substack redirect waitlist link. Read the frameworks; ignore the offer unless we’re already evaluating Cole’s paid programs.

The core argument

Three “myths” that keep would-be digital-product creators stuck:

  1. “My audience isn’t big enough yet.” No magic threshold exists. Niches don’t need to be big — they need to be specific. Cole’s example: a 5-level-deep niche (Sports → Football → Pro Football → Kansas City Chiefs → Game Film) has thousands of paid Substack subscribers. The smaller and more focused, the easier it is to find the people who’ll love it. Plant the flag now.

  2. “I’m not an expert in anything.” Reframe: you’re a “Niche Expert” in solving the problems you used to have. There are people a few months behind you on the same journey. The teachable surface is the gap between past-you and present-you — pinpoint the questions you used to have that you no longer have. Example given: LinkedIn creator Ali Merchant turning past manager experience into leadership content.

  3. “Once I pick a niche, I can’t change it.” Niche selection is dating, not marriage. You’re learning who you are as a creator, finding mutual fit, and you can leave any time. Cole “dated” writing alongside bodybuilding, creativity, self-development, and marketing for years before doubling down on writing once data showed what resonated. After ~1 year of creating, pick one specific topic and go all-in.

Bottom line per Cole: the bottleneck at every level is “faulty beliefs about money & selling digital products.”

Mapping against Ray Data Co

Reinforces: the 2026-04-12-write-with-ai-big-idea-frameworks and 2026-04-15-write-with-ai-offer-stacking-framework thread — Cole’s whole stack is “stop optimizing the surface, fix the belief that’s blocking the action.” For Sanity Check, Myth #2 is the load-bearing one: Ben is a “Niche Expert” on the founder-COO operating rhythm, AI-native data engineering discipline, and the prediction-markets-as-research thesis precisely because he’s a few months ahead of where the audience is. The “what questions did you used to have” prompt is a usable Sanity Check topic generator — worth running against the content calendar.

Surfaces a gap: RDCO has not formally written down its “5-levels-deep” niche specificity. The current positioning (“AI-native data engineering for solo operators / founder-COO rhythm”) is probably level 3, not level 5. Worth a separate concept article: what’s the Kansas-City-Chiefs-Game-Film equivalent for RDCO?

Contradicts nothing, but the dating-not-marriage framing is a useful counter to any future temptation to lock in the niche prematurely.

Plain-text Substack email. Paraphrased throughout; quoted phrases kept under 15 words.