01-projects/investing/anchors/dram-spot

trendforce backfill notes

·anchor-source-doc·source: TrendForce press release archive

DRAM / NAND / HBM phase-marker backfill — TrendForce historical scrape

What this is

First-pass historical dataset for the memory-cycle phase-marker anchor used by the memory-supercycle investing thesis. Sourced from TrendForce's public press release archive (~6,700 articles scanned across 723 category pages). Output is a time-series CSV of dated memory-pricing observations with direction, tier, vendor, and magnitude when quantified.

The scraper is reusable and idempotent (resume mode + seen-URL persistence); intended to be wired into the monthly investing cron after this initial backfill.

Coverage achieved

Monthly density (data points per month)

Year Avg/month Notes
2021 2.2 Scraper cap (oldest tier of /news/YYYY/MM/DD/ URL scheme)
2022 0.7 TrendForce published less press content per topic in the memory bust
2023 4.7 Coverage picks up Q2 onward
2024 5.3 Good monthly coverage
2025 6.8 Best year for coverage
2026-YTD 9.3 Highest density, supercycle reporting in full swing

Gaps and known limits

Coverage gaps

Data quality caveats

Top 3 trends visible in the data

  1. Memory supercycle is clearly visible in directional data. 2021Q3 was the post-pandemic peak (avg direction +0.89, n=9). 2022Q2-Q4 saw crushing declines (-1.00 averages with limited data). 2023Q2 directional reversal begins (+0.33), then accelerates monotonically through 2025Q4 (+0.91, n=23) and into 2026 (+0.75, n=28). This is the supercycle thesis playing out in the primary-source data — not analyst extrapolation.

  2. HBM3E is the highest-magnitude pricing tier in the latest data. Of 19 HBM3E rows, every direction-quantified one is positive with double-digit magnitude_pct values (avg ~25%+ on quantified rows). Compare to DDR4 (47 rows, mostly low-single-digit % moves) and DDR5 (99 rows, also single-to-mid-double-digit). HBM is structurally different from commodity DRAM in this dataset, supporting the thesis that AI-driven HBM allocation is reshaping the price curve.

  3. Vendor concentration is exactly as the thesis assumes. Top mentions: Samsung (120), SK Hynix (87+87 dup), Micron (85). Kioxia is a distant 4th (32, NAND-only). CXMT only 5 mentions despite being the China DRAM wildcard — under-covered by TrendForce relative to its potential market impact. Cross-check needed against Chinese-language sources for CXMT-specific signal.

Recommended next steps for ongoing scraping

Wire into investing cron (cheap, do next session)

Improve data quality (medium priority)

Backfill pre-2021 (next session, 60-min budget)

Add a second source for triangulation

Pair with cross-check skill

Once the CSV has 6+ months of monthly cron data, run /cross-check against vault memory thesis docs (e.g. ~/rdco-vault/01-projects/investing/theses/memory-supercycle*) to flag any "thesis says X, data says Y" contradictions before they cost capital.

Files written this session

Cross-references