/decisions · 2026-05-17 · investing · memory-cycle-v1

Deploy memory cycle v1 paper trade — go / revise / defer / archive?

Founder gate on first executable thesis under the v2 investing process. All paper; no live capital at risk. Click-back via iMessage closes the loop.

Memory thesis v1 is filed (source-aggregated + bear-cased + cross-domain-translated). Strategy: tranche-accumulate MU + SMH, no per-trade stops, exit on phase-marker flip. Initial deploy = 1R ($5k) split across the two names. This is paper only — strategy validation, not real capital deployment.

Context

Full thesis: 2026-05-17-memory-cycle-v1.md. Parent: Innermost Loop chips-layer thesis.

Thesis in one paragraph: HBM supply structurally short through 2027. All 2026 HBM capacity pre-sold to hyperscalers (MU + Hynix + Samsung). MU Q2 fiscal 2026 revenue +196% YoY at 81% gross margins, Q3 guide $33.5B / $19.15 EPS, 2026 capex raised to $20B with HBM4 ramping Q2 2026. DRAM contract prices +90-95% Q1 2026 QoQ, +58-63% Q2 forecast. Three demand-side anchors: hyperscaler capex direction, DRAM spot 30d trend, HBM capacity-online cadence. Exit on 2+ anchors flipping for 2 consecutive quarters.

Cross-domain handle: structurally identical to the Snowflake credit-consumption cycle 2020-2022 — oligopoly supply, customer concentration in hyperscalers, multi-year demand visibility through signed contracts, gross-margin compression as the leading exit signal. The thing that breaks it is also identical: customer optimization eating the hardware tax (MoE routing, KV-cache compression) faster than supply catches up. If you've seen Snowflake's 2021 GM curve vs its 2023 curve, you've seen this thesis. My read: memory 2026 ≈ Snowflake mid-2021. The bear case is that we're actually at Snowflake late-2022 already.

Bear case strength: medium-strong. The "fully sold out" signal is exactly the late-cycle marker memory has always had at peaks (2017 supercycle ended this way). Operational fragility at Hynix (engineer poaching + 50k-worker strike) + China DDR5 wildcard (CXMT/YMTC) are real near-term risks. Single fact that would force capitulation to bull case: any hyperscaler signing a 3+ year HBM offtake contract at fixed price.

Deploy parameters

ParamValue
ModePaper only (Alpaca paper sandbox)
1R unit$5,000
Initial deploy1R total — MU 0.5R ($2.5k) + SMH 0.5R ($2.5k)
Max per name2R ($10k)
Max bucket (memory total)4R ($20k)
Tranche 2 trigger-5% from t1 avg OR thesis-confirming catalyst
Tranche 3 trigger-10% from t1 avg OR earnings catalyst
Per-trade stopNone (thesis-stop, not price-stop)
Profit trims+50% trim 0.5R; +100% trim another 0.5R
Kill switch2+ anchors bearish for 2Q OR founder channel "halt memory"
Review cadenceQuarterly (Ray runs, surfaces to founder via channel + /decisions/ if any anchor flips)

Lock in

Approve — deploy paper per locked parameters

Ray fires initial 1R tranche (MU 0.5R + SMH 0.5R) into Alpaca paper. Logs to positions/. Sets up quarterly anchor watch. Use the field for any context Ray should know going in.

Approve + send
Revise — return with parameter notes

Thesis is close but a parameter needs adjusting. Name what (sizing, ticker, tranche trigger, exit rule, etc.) and Ray re-files a v2.

Revise + send
Archive — thesis does not deploy

Thesis fundamentally doesn't pencil. Ray files as status: archived-pre-deploy with reason. No paper trade.

Archive + send
Defer — hold for next quarterly review

Wait. Re-evaluate at the named date (next quarterly check or specific catalyst).

Defer + send